Do You Use Yammer at Work? And Why Not SharePoint?

There was a question a while back on the Microsoft MVPs LinkedIn group (YAFSN! – see below) wondering “Do you use Yammer at work?”

I’m still trying to figure out how much I want to use Yammer. As when Google+ came out, I’m trying it. I pretty much abandoned G+, and Yammer may well go the same way for most things.

I got into Yammer via an invitation into SPYam from Bjørn Furuknap with my USPJA email address. Now I’m trapped into that identity for SPYam (the network for SharePoint discussions that Joel Oleson set up – ping me if you’d like an invitation) but have to use my work email address to access the SharePoint MVP network into which Microsoft has seemingly decided to move all communications. That tying of one’s identity to a single email domain (it seems you can’t combine domains into one über identity) is my biggest beef with the Yammer platform. I’m sure they will work that out, though. (Yammer probably could have done it in a few weeks. Now that it’s a Microsoft product, maybe in Yammer 2016, and you’ll only need to add a three server farm to enable it.)

I read a constant stream of complaints about other aspects of how Yammer works in – natch – Yammer. Sure, there are some true annoyances (no Shift-Enter in post entry, no parity between clients, Adobe Air!) but I could give you a litany of similar annoyances for every single YAFSN. User interfaces seem to always have annoyances. The important thing is how fast the people who develop the platform can react to consistent complaints and improve.

Everyone seems to think we need YAFSN (Yet Another Fantastic Social Network), but each new one that comes along simply fragments the landscape further. Who has the time to check dozens of these damn things? Social in the workplace must be a performance improvement, not a detriment. (I’d argue we should hold our personal social network use to the same standard. LOL catz!) if I have to check four or five social networks constantly in order to be well-informed, that drags down my efficiency.

I’ll keep using Yammer for the MVP stuff because I don’t have any choice, of course. Gotta get all those “secrets” somehow. It really makes me wonder, though, why we don’t use SharePoint to talk about SharePoint. It seems that in the vast majority of cases, SharePointilists prefer to use a different technology to communicate about SharePoint. That, to me, raises a far more important question: “Do you use SharePoint at work?”

Oh, I almost forgot to answer the original question. As a solo practitioner, there’s only me at work, so I don’t really need Yammer. I already have excellent tools in place to enable the voices in my head to converse.

Collecting Souls: Knowing Your Social Media Strategy – Part Three

When I first started using the nascent Internet back in 1992 (How many of you were even alive – or at least out of Legos – by then? Raise ’em up!), there was little I could do to interact with it. Most content was static and commenting barely existed. There were very few “publishers”, and they were sharply skewed toward academics and others with access to University computer networks.

imageThere were, however, some content islands. I was a member of Prodigy and later CompuServe, and each had some places where one could express one’s self. As I remember, other than the early forms of chat rooms, there were discussions about stocks and some other investments, at least.

These content islands absolutely couldn’t support any crossover. Anything I posted in one was never going to be seen in another, and all of us thought that anonymity or identity walling was the way it would just be forever. (Sure, smarter people than I and pundits knew it would change, perhaps, but I’m a member of the unclean masses.)

Forward to the late 1990s, and there was an explosion of content islands as part of the Internet bubble. I worked for a company at the time called ArsDigita, and one of the things we did was help companies build their content islands, either by using our open source ArsDigita Community System (ACS) toolkit (a descendant of which is still available as OpenACS) or by hiring us to build them for them. One of the main goals for Internet sites was to make them “sticky”, meaning to increase the time someone would spend on them. A great lever to pull to make that happen was to create a community aspect for the site, and that’s exactly what ACS and those of us on the consulting staff tried to achieve. Make it interactive, and the eyeballs would stick around.

imageHowever many of these content islands there were during those days, they were still islands. It was like the manmade island structures off the shore of Dubai as opposed to the remoteness of the South Seas, perhaps, but they remained islands all the same.

Fast forward to the late oughts, and we started building bridges from island to island. Some outfits like Gravatar and the OpenID Foundation even built transportation hubs to move us easily from island to island. It started to feel like the teleporter from Star Trek; we barely felt the effects of the travel and we were able to interact with new cultures almost instantaneously. No longer was our persona isolated to a single island, where I might choose to have one “handle” on one island and another handle elsewhere. We’ve all gotten very used to linking up our island personas into one super-ego of self.

So what? Well, what this all amounts to is that it is no longer reasonable to assume that we can have unique, separate personas from Internet island to Internet island. For better or worse, we have all become citizens of the Internet world, passport in hand. There are many implications of all this, and some have profound implications for our current and future selves.

First, as opposed to the early days, content may as well be forever. Sure, islands occasionally submerge or become part of larger islands, but in general, the content we create – our Internet footprints on the beach – are going to be there for a good long time. What we may post as an angry comment on someone’s blog or as a cute photo with our virtual pants down isn’t going away anytime soon.

25 - Footprints on Beach, Northern California, United States
This travel blog photo’s source is TravelPod page: Eureka, Arcata and the Humboldt Coast

Second, we can’t realistically expect that we can manage separate personas as we often do in the meat world. I may act one way with my family, another with my mates in the pub, and another with my work colleagues, but on the Internet that is possible less and less. Someone in any of those groups is likely to follow me on Twitter, link with me on LinkedIn, read my blog, *and* friend me on Facebook. Suddenly my separate personas must meld together, or at least they will in the minds of the consumer.

The ginormous caveat in all of this is that a few assaholic moves on one island are going to follow you around the Internet world. In my [scarily almost 50 years] of experience, it works much like it does in consumerism. People remember your mistakes over your triumphs (unless they are *really* big triumphs) and carry the “lowest common denominator” opinion of you around with them.

imageThis may all sound sort of interesting, at least if you’ve managed to read this far. In practical terms, the way it has changed my thinking over the last year or two as I have tried to build some sort of personal brand for myself in the archipelago is that I must be my best self as much as possible.

I’ve chosen to use the Social Web professionally. As a solo practitioner, it sure beats advertising. That means that my every social move gets tacked onto my professional persona. When I tweet about my love for bacon, does it cloud a Muslim’s view of my capabilities as a SharePointilist? Does complaining about Microsoft’s sometimes abysmal documentation put me at risk in the technical community in which I’ve decided to be a member? Does tagging myself in a friend’s silly photo from college in 1981 put my possibilities for the next great consulting gig in jeopardy?

Lest you think I’ve become obsessively self-centered and sit in a darkened room contemplating my every move, rest assured that is not the case! I simply try to be cognizant from time to time that my every action may have an equal or *larger* reaction on the Social Web.

So what can you take away from this post? Well, just as every woman who has thought it would be funny to bare their chest for Girls Gone Wild and then wondered later “What the %#?$& was I thinking?”, pause once in a while and think about the persona you want to present to the world. If something is nagging at the back of your mind that maybe that little post isn’t such a great idea, hold off clicking on the Send button and read it over again, maybe a little later.

Think from time to time what your Social Media strategy is. Is it connected to your professional persona? Is it just for your silly side? Would you kiss your momma with that mouth? The Social Web is an amazingly rich and rewarding experience. Be sure to try the poi at the luau!

Collecting Souls: Knowing Your Social Media Strategy – Part One

Around the time that my wife was pregnant with our son, I got very into genealogy. Suddenly it seemed very important to understand my backstory, and then my wife’s backstory, and even the backstory of any friends who were silly enough to mention a possibly famous ancestor to me. Since I’m a computer guy, I started mining every source I could find, which at the time included RootsWeb,, and Each of those sites gave me a way to grab a branch from someone else’s tree which I saw connected to mine and to easily graft it onto my own. I wildly grabbed all of the underbrush I could find, and got to almost 6000 people in my son’s tree. In truth, I was simply taking many other people’s unconfirmed research and adding it into my own. In retrospect, I had no idea whether any of the data was actually correct, and on some level I didn’t care. I just wanted to grow a bigger tree.  I started to think of this activity as “collecting souls”.

Today’s social media landscape lends itself to the same type of activity. It seems that many people simply want to be connected, linked, added to as many others’ cadres of souls as possible. But what does that actually mean? We could each grab some census data and, for those of us with a programming bent, simply stuff everyone into our guffins*.

It’s important to understand what your own social media strategy is. It may well be to decide you don’t have one, and that may be fine, too. But many of the social media opportunities out there will either follow us usefully or dog us throughout time based on how we use them. I thought I’d give a little outline of my own strategies for how I use the main social media outlets that I frequent to possibly help you think about your own strategy.

In each case, I’m not going to talk about all of the spam invitations, offers, etc., specifically. I try to squelch them as much as I can and also to actively report spammers where there are mechanisms to do so. To me, this is a part of our social responsibility. If the spammers continue unchecked, then all of these platforms will degrade into a useless muck of porn come-one, low-cost pharmaceutical ads, and the like.


The largest social network in the world isn’t a big focus for me. I signed up for Facebook as soon as it started to get some press, but I’ve never really used it, with a few exceptions. For instance, when my class at Exeter was about to hold our 30th reunion, there was a move to sign everyone up on Facebook so that we could sort of catch up in advance of seeing each other. So the Exeter Class of 1979 is a big part of my social graph there. I also connected early on with most of my relatives because that felt like a good place to interact with my largely non-technical family. It turns out that only a few of my relatives seem to actively use it, at least based on my only occasional perusal of my feed.

I’ve connected my blog to Facebook because I know that some folks who work in the SharePoint world, as I do, like to consume the content there. (This gets me occasional questions from my family and friends like “Do you ever post anything on your blog in English?”)

So who do I connect with on Facebook? I rarely ask anyone to connect there, and because I don’t really consider it a platform that I actually use, I am fairly indiscriminate in accepting invitations. If people I work with want to see pictures of me drinking beer in college or on my beach vacation in 1992 with my family , then so be it.

Business Use: Low
Personal Use: Low


LinkedIn has been, to me, the serious outlet in the crowd. I think I signed up for it way back in 2001 or 2002, and I kept my invitations and acceptances to only people I had worked with for some considerable time and could vouch for. Over time, I altered that to also include people who I admired and had at least met and had a decently long conversation with; someone who was a sympatico on some level and to whom I’d like to be related.

I get invitations all the time from people I ‘ve never heard of, who want to link with me because we’re members of the same LinkedIn group or because they like my SPServices jQuery library or something. I’m always flattered that someone took the time to look me up and ask to connect, but I don’t always feel that there’s any reason to connect with them. Maybe it’s the way Momma brought me up, but it feels rude to simply click the ignore button, so I’ll often write a little note back with the rejection explaining a little bit about how I think about using LinkedIn. But sometimes I’ll let the invitations back up and end up simply clicking the ignore button on a bunch of therm. This actually makes me feel bad, but I get over it. So, for LinkedIn, my rules are somewhat stringent, but there are always exceptions.

LinkedIn is excellent for understanding how to approach someone I’m meeting in a professional situation. In the technical orbs that I work within, there’s usually some connection between me and the person I’m going to meet. We either have worked in the same place at different times or have worked with someone we’re both linked to. If nothing else, it’s an icebreaker.

Business use: High
Personal use: Low


Foursquare to me is a bit of a lark. I like the fact that they’ve recently beefed up the point-gathering capabilities, which makes it fun to check in places. I even like getting the badges. I get invitations from time to time from people, and I usually accept them. If someone really cares where I’m having dinner on the weekend with my family, then so be it. I don’t use it all that regularly, and I’ll often check in without notifying my other networks (I’ve connected it to Facebook and Twitter). But it can be useful to check in with notification that I’m at a conference or meeting somewhere so that I can find the people I’m looking for.

Business use: Low
Personal use: Low


Twitter is really my social outlet of choice. I use it primarily to communicate about things I learn and find useful in my professional world. Sure, I occasionally say something about what I’m doing, but I try to keep the “I’m eating a ham sandwich” tweets to a minimum.

Twitter is the social channel of choice for the SharePoint crowd. (I’ll talk about SharePoint a bit more in Part Two.) We use it to share links to blog posts or articles we like, ask for assistance, and otherwise banter amongst ourselves about what we are working on. The SharePoint community is the most amazingly strong technical community I’ve ever interacted with, and it may well be because of outlets like Twitter which allow us to interact on a regular basis with birds of a feather from around the world.

To me, Twitter gives me the right mix of valuable content and connections along with the ability to make surprisingly strong personal social connections.

Business use: High
Personal Use: Low 

In conclusion, as you leave your footprints all over the InterWebs, try to think about what sort of social legacy you are building. Increasingly, it is becoming our resume, as published to the world. When we research people for hiring, we are as likely to Google them or look them up on Facebook as we are to read their traditional resume. Be sure that your social resume says what you want it to say about you. We also judge people on what and how they talk about themselves and their daily life. For better or for worse, social media allows us to make even more rapid snap judgments which may or may not be fair.

And while it’s fun to collect souls indescriminately, make sure you know which ones you need and have value for you, and which ones you can allow to stay out there on their own. It’s a big, big world, and no matter how much fun it all is, we aren’t all related to everyone.

* A good friend of mine swears there’s a Stephen King story in which a monster collects people’s souls in something called a “guffin”. We’ve never been able to find the reference, but I like to use the word anyway: guffin – a container for storing souls.

Removing LinkedIn Connections

Image representing LinkedIn as depicted in Cru...

Image via CrunchBase

C’mon, we’ve all done it. We get that invitation to connect on LinkedIn, and in a moment of weakness, we say “Sure!”.  Then later we wonder who the heck Bert is, anyway. Or you realize that the guy you thought was wonderful and wouldn’t it be great to show everyone you knew actually turned out to be an utter cad.

I’ve had to look hard for the page where I can remove connections a few times, and since I just did again, I figured I’d post it here for posterity. I *think* it’s been in roughly the same place every time, but I don’t go there often, so I always forget.

Go to Contacts / My Connections and in the upper right under the search box, you should see a link to Remove Connections. That takes you to this page, where you can quietly and privately remove connections from your profile.

Lest you worry that your old pal will realize you are severing the ties:

imageI know that many people try to collect as many souls as they can put in their guffin with services like LinkedIn, but I try to make my connections mean something. That means that I try to limit my connections to people I’ve worked with on something significant, respect for their work in my fields of interest, or are related to me. Sometimes I screw up, and that’s when this page comes in handy. Sorry, Bert.

Keeping Score on 64 bit vs. 32 bit Microsoft Applications

As those of you who follow this blog know, I’ve get the best laptop in the world.  One of the joys of it is the 64 bit architecture.  I was lagging behind with my old Jornata Dell Latitude D820, and now I can VM with the big boys.

But can I really?  It turns out that many 64 bit applications are actually a step backward in other ways.

Product Architecture Benefits Drawbacks
Office 2010 32 bit
  • My Excel spreadsheets can only cover the state of RI
64 bit
  • Really big Excel spreadsheets that can cover the eastern US
  • Very few add-ins work
  • Can’t cohabitate with SharePoint Designer 2007 (my workhorse tool) *unless* you uninstall SPD first, install O2010x64, and then reinstall SPD2007. (Last bit per Jeremy below)
  • Can’t use Datasheet view with SharePoint lists
Internet Explorer 32 bit    
64 bit  
  • No Flash – Adobe doesn’t have an x64 plugin (per @gusfraser) Ed.: Not clear that this is a drawback. ;+)

What else goes in the tables?  Tell me your plusses and minuses, and I’ll update the tables so that everyone can make good decisions.